TruSilver Metals Corp. Reserved TSXV symbol: TAG Sturgis-Walton Silver Project, Nova Scotia
Illustration: two geologists on a rocky ridge, one holding a tablet, looking over a forested valley to a drill rig and camp beside a lake in evening light.

Our Geologists Are Building the AI That Aims Our Five‑Hole Silver Drill Program, and Each Hole Improves It.

Beside the old Walton Mine in Nova Scotia there’s a piece of ground that reads as larger and stronger on our gravity and AMT surveys than the historically mined Walton orebody itself.1 That’s the ground our drill program is designed to test. Five holes will test the Sturgis Target, roughly 3,500 metres, starting in November.1, 2

Our Project Geologist, Jeff Burke, is building the model that aims our drill holes more precisely, built upon our own surveys, our own core, decades of geological expertise and the Walton records themselves, as well as the downhole data each new hole adds.1 Hole one tests and trains it, and then from there informs where each of the next holes is going.

At a glance

CompanyTruSilver Metals Corp., a Canadian silver exploration company. Reserved TSX Venture symbol: TAG.
ProjectSturgis-Walton Silver Project, Hants County, Nova Scotia. 1,120 hectares, 100% owned. No NSR exists on the property.
The modelBeing built in-house by our Project Geologist, Jeff Burke, P.Geo., from our own surveys and drilling, the Walton Mine record and the data each new hole adds. TruSilver owns the IP.
Drill planFive diamond drill holes, about 3,500 metres. The drilling permit is in place to March 2028.
StatusDrilling expected to begin in early November 2026. 3D model launch planned for December.

Where we’re drilling

Here’s where we’re drilling, and why.

In 1955, a drill under the barite pit at Walton, in Hants County, Nova Scotia, came up with silver-rich sulphides. From 1961 an underground mine took silver, lead, zinc and copper out of that find, down to 314 metres. Flooding shut the underground through the 1970s, and mining stopped in 1978.1

Our Sturgis-Walton project sits next to that mine, 1,120 hectares that we own outright.2, 1 We think the system that fed the mine keeps going, south and deeper, and our surveys back it up: on our ground, the gravity and AMT response reads larger and stronger in 3D than over the historically mined Walton orebody.1

In November we start drilling to find out, and the first hole is already drawn.2, 1 Here’s the picture.

Cross-section looking north through the Sturgis Target, showing the proposed first drill hole ST-26-01A entering from the west and passing through two interpreted target zones, with magnetic data, gravity contours and historic drill holes.
Looking north. The proposed first hole, ST-26-01A, comes in from the west and is designed to cross both target zones. The zones are our initial interpretation of the surveys to date, and the hole’s location and depth may change.Tap to enlarge

Jeff Burke, our Project Geologist, put it the way a geologist does, looking at the AMT:

“It actually looks like a trunk and branch. It’s pretty compelling when it physically looks like that.”3

That’s the shape we’re testing. The geology behind it we’ve already spoken about in a report explaining the branch-and-trunk theory behind our drill target.

Jim and Jeff

Jim knows the ground, and Jeff keeps bringing him questions.

Jim Michaelis has spent more than 40 years on Walton-Sturgis, with Gulf and then Billiton, and he built the fold model behind our 2023 hole.1 By the time Jeff arrived, Jim had already digitized the archive, saving months (if not years) of prep time. We’re talking decades of drill logs and mine records, ready to use for Jeff on day one.3

Jeff came in with 20 years in exploration, six of them in AI start-ups.1 He takes a geological workflow, the steps he’d work through by hand, and turns it into code. “That turns into a script, and we can use that in almost any interface.”3 So instead of waiting on a developer, or relying on third-party IP, he builds the tool himself and puts the surveys, the chemistry and the old drill logs on one screen.3

Then he takes what he finds to Jim. The way Jeff tells it, his research turns up something odd, he asks about it, and Jim says, “Well, you know what? I did see something like this.”, and according to Jeff, “That’s when the magic starts to happen.”3

The duo talks most days, and they’ve been in the field together. That’s a hand-off most projects never get; usually the knowledge leaves with the people who had it.3 As our presentation puts it, most of our team lives an hour from the drill.1 Here are the people behind TruSilver and who owns its shares.

We’ll send you our drill results as soon as they’re public.Send me the drill results

What goes into the model

Finding a deposit costs more than it used to, so the aim has to be better.

MinEx Consulting keeps the industry’s discovery count. In 2009, the world found 202 significant mineral deposits, but now the industry only finds about 70 to 90 a year, and the ones still out there sit deeper.4 In the 2010s a base-metal discovery sat under 193 metres of cover on average.4

  • 70 to 90Significant deposits the world now finds in a year, down from 202 in 2009.4
  • US$200 millionWhat it costs, on average, to find one.4
  • 21%The share of the world’s exploration money that went to early-stage ground in 2025, the lowest on record.5

Put that beside us. We raised C$2.83 million ahead of drilling.6 Call it US$2 million, about one percent of what the industry spends to find one deposit.4 Nobody on that budget gets to drill blind. Our aim needs to be on point, and that precision aim is what Jeff is building for us.

The same MinEx paper says AI pays off first near existing mines, where there’s a record to learn from.4 That’s Walton. Decades of drilling, the mine records and three surveys, compiled into one 3D model that ranks where the silver is likeliest.1 Data tools, including AI, speed up the work. Experienced geologists guide the process and make every call.1

One piece of it is a measure Jeff calls the silver ratio: a statistical test that zones in on the ground most likely to carry silver. In the trade it’s called mineral prospectivity mapping, and the geology is what determines how that flows. First, he ran it on the surface samples, against the geophysics. Now he’s running it on the core, 34 elements or more, looking for which ratios match and where they overlap with what the other surveys saw.3

Jeff draws the line this way. “There’s uncertainty and there’s risk, and people confuse the two. You have more information out of the gate. It’s less risk now.”3

Every figure, with its source

What went inWhat it is
2021 magnetic surveyOne drone survey, 163 line-kilometres, covering the mine and Sturgis on the same trend.1
2024 gravity surveyGround gravity, with 3D analysis. It outlined the Sturgis Target: an anomaly of more than 1 mGal, 800 metres long as mapped, which we interpret at about 1,200 to 1,400 metres once the fold is straightened out.1
2024 AMT surveyThree large conductors, seen to about 700 metres.1
The 2023 hole, ST-23-00112.15 g/t silver over 10.5 metres, and 48.8 g/t silver over 19.0 metres (533 to 552 metres) with 0.19% copper. Drilled lengths.1
Two 1960s holes, deepened in 2026S70-1Ext and S68-5Ext, both deepened to the Macumber host formation, with sulphides logged in both. Assays pending.1
The chemistry34 elements, their ratios and where they overlap with the surveys.3
The archiveDecades of drill logs and mine records, digitized by Jim Michaelis.3

Three signals

Three different readings, and they’ve all pointed us at the same ground.

A hundred years ago, prospectors found three quarters of the world’s deposits by walking the ground. Today they find fewer than one in ten.4 And the rest mostly get found by people reading instruments, and three of those readings sit under this page.

Gravity reads how dense the rock is. Magnetics reads how magnetic it is. AMT reads how well it conducts electricity.1 Three different data sets, and at Sturgis all three came back pointing us toward the same patch of ground.1

The twist is barite.

Barite, Jeff says, is an insulator. So a conductivity reading on its own can mislead, in the geophysics and in the assays, which is why we ran three surveys and not one, and why the downhole surveys tighten them further.3 Here’s how three geophysical surveys led us to one drill target.

The earlier holes

What the earlier holes taught us.

We’ve drilled here before. In 2023 our hole cut 48.8 g/t silver over 19.0 metres, with 0.19% copper.1 This year we deepened two 1960s holes and both reached the same host rock. Those assays are still pending.1

Jeff’s read on the old holes is quite useful for us. Deep holes drift, and when he laid them over the survey picture, they came out just outside the zone where the readings overlap best. “We were getting close, but we weren’t that close.”3

So the first hole of our November drill program goes in where that overlap is, from the west, designed to cut both target zones.1 “For the information that’s given,” Jeff says, “it’s as good as it gets.”3

Each hole teaches the next

Each hole teaches the next.

When hole one goes down we’ll get two kinds of information at once. The core, which is rock we can log and sample. And the ground beside the hole, which the core never touches. Borehole EM goes down the hole and looks sideways for conductive sulphides the drill may have passed.1 Downhole gravity and downhole IP read the same hole, and an extended ground AMT survey adds to the picture from the surface.1 The surface picture also carries the older airborne surveys, VTEM among them, and the surface chemistry as it’s updated.3

All of it feeds one 3D model, and that model’s job is to aim the next hole.1 Jeff’s word for it is vectoring. “We’re going to get a direction. The next hole should go this way.”3

“You get more insight the more you actually drill,

because of the data that’s coming in and you’re ready to capture it and use it.”

Jeff Burke, Project Geologist3
Diagram of TruSilver’s drilling loop: a drill hole produces core and downhole survey readings, the geologists and the 3D model update the targets, and the next hole is aimed from what the last one taught.
Tap to enlarge
WhenWhat happens
November 2026Drilling starts. Five holes, about 3,500 metres.2, 1
As each hole progressesBorehole EM searches beside the hole for conductive sulphides.1
December 20263D model launch: the model with the first holes’ data in it, and the targets it gives. More precise targets as new data lands, with target updates to follow.1
Winter 2026 to 27Assays, interval by interval. Released as they arrive, not held for the whole hole.1

Timing depends on the drill contract, site conditions and laboratory turnaround.1

That’s what goes into hole one. What comes out of it is the first thing the model learns, and the first thing we send you.

We’ll send you our drill results as soon as they’re public.Send me the drill results

The model stays with the Company

The model stays with us. It’s ours.

At the end of the day, TruSilver owns the IP.1 Jeff is building it on our time, from our data, and it doesn’t go anywhere when the program ends. His version of it is blunter. “It’s not a consultant saying here’s a map, we’ve taken the data and we’re going to keep training our models with it. This is highly specific and focused on the company’s goals. We’re retaining what I’m building.”3

For a sense of what the biggest money in the business thinks of this way of working: KoBold Metals, which calls its approach AI-and-human-driven, took Mingomba in Zambia from an exploration project in late 2022 to breaking ground on the mine’s shafts in April 2026, on a project KoBold says would typically take more than fifteen years to reach production.7 Ours is being built here, for this ground, and it’s ours.

Why here

Why Nova Scotia, and why this ground.

Jeff lives here. Jim lives here. Jeff’s reason for looking here is simple enough. “Not a lot of people have paid attention over here, and I have, for years, just prospecting and looking at stuff, trying to find what would work here… I’m a guy that likes the underdog, or the overlooked, or has something to prove.”3

Overlooked is the word. Even his uncle who’s lived in this province for eighty-some years had never heard of the Walton Mine.3

But those in charge of the province haven’t overlooked its existence. Nova Scotia put silver on its critical minerals list in May 2025,8 and it has put C$150,000 of grant money into this ground.1 In late 2025 Rio Tinto staked every open claim in the Minas sub-basin around us, looking for copper.9 Here’s why Rio Tinto’s claim staking matters to our Nova Scotia story.

And the metal. The computers behind AI run on silver too; the Silver Institute’s 2026 survey names growth in AI infrastructure among the things holding up silver’s industrial demand.10 We’re using new tools to find a metal the new tools need. Here’s why most of the world’s silver comes from by-product mines.

When you’ll hear

When you’ll hear from us.

A deep hole takes weeks to drill. The lab takes four weeks or more.1 Samples go out as the hole crosses the target zones, not held back for the whole hole, and every result goes out by news release, to everyone at the same time.1 You’ll have it the day it’s public.

We’ll send you our drill results as soon as they’re public.Send me the drill results

Five holes. One model. And with every new hole, our AI learns more and becomes more refined.

The target’s mapped, the first hole’s drawn, and the model’s just waiting on more core.

Follow the discovery

What happens next.

When hole one’s assays are public, we’ll send them to you the same day. Leave your email here.

We respect your privacy. No unsolicited communications.

Frequently asked

How does TruSilver Metals use AI to pick its drill targets?

TruSilver Metals’ Project Geologist, Jeff Burke, is building an in-house targeting model that compiles the Company’s magnetic, gravity and AMT surveys, its drilling, the rock chemistry and the Walton Mine record into one 3D model and ranks where silver is likeliest at the Sturgis-Walton Silver Project in Nova Scotia. Data tools, including AI, speed up the work; experienced geologists guide the process and make every call. Core and downhole surveys from each hole feed the model to aim the next.1, 3

What information went into TruSilver’s targeting model?

TruSilver Metals’ model draws on the 2021 magnetic survey, 163 line-kilometres over the mine and Sturgis; the 2024 ground gravity survey and its 3D analysis; the 2024 AMT survey, three large conductors seen to about 700 metres; the 2023 hole ST-23-001; two 1960s holes deepened in 2026; 34 elements of rock chemistry; and the digitized archive of drilling and mine records.1, 3

Does TruSilver own the model?

Yes. TruSilver Metals owns the IP in the targeting model its Project Geologist, Jeff Burke, is building in-house on the Company’s own data. The model stays with the Company and keeps learning as the drilling goes on.1, 3

How does hole one change hole two?

Core and downhole surveys from TruSilver Metals’ first hole, borehole EM, downhole gravity and downhole IP, plus an extended ground AMT survey from the surface, feed one 3D model to aim the next hole. Jeff Burke calls it vectoring: the data gives a direction, and the next hole follows it.1, 3

What is the 3D model launch in December 2026?

TruSilver Metals’ targeting model aimed the first hole from the Company’s surveys, drilling and mine records. The 3D model launch planned for December 2026 is that model with the first holes’ core and downhole data in it, giving more precise targets, with target updates to follow as new data lands. Timing depends on the drill contract, site conditions and laboratory turnaround.1

What do the three surveys measure, and what did each one see?

Gravity measures rock density, and TruSilver Metals’ 2024 survey outlined the Sturgis Target, an anomaly of more than 1 mGal and 800 metres long as mapped. Magnetics measures the rock’s magnetic response, and one 163 line-kilometre survey covers the mine and Sturgis on the same trend. AMT measures conductivity, and the 2024 survey found three large conductors seen to about 700 metres. In 3D, the gravity and AMT response for interpreted sulphide mineralization at Sturgis is larger and stronger than over the Walton orebody.1

When do the drill results come, and how often?

TruSilver Metals reports assays interval by interval as the lab returns them and the Company has checked them, rather than holding them for a whole hole. Laboratory turnaround is currently four weeks or more. Every result goes out by news release, and to the email list on this page as soon as it’s public.1

Who is Jeff Burke, and how does he work with Jim Michaelis?

Jeff Burke, P.Geo., is TruSilver Metals’ Project Geologist, with 20 years in exploration and six in AI start-ups, KorrAI and Mercator, and he is building the Company’s in-house targeting model. Jim Michaelis, P.Geo., a co-founder, has more than 40 years on Walton-Sturgis with Gulf and Billiton and built the fold model behind the 2023 hole. They talk most days and have worked the ground together; Jeff takes what the model turns up to Jim, who often recognizes it from the record.1, 3

What is the Sturgis target?

The Sturgis Target is the deep exploration target on TruSilver Metals’ 100%-owned Sturgis-Walton Silver Project in Hants County, Nova Scotia, about 1.4 kilometres south-southwest of the historic Walton Mine. Magnetic, gravity and AMT surveys define it; the gravity anomaly is more than 800 metres long as mapped and interpreted at about 1,200 to 1,400 metres unfolded. The first hole of the 2026 program is designed to cut both target zones from the west.1

What did the 2023 hole and the 2026 deepened holes find?

TruSilver Metals’ 2023 hole, ST-23-001, cut 12.15 g/t silver over 10.5 metres and 48.8 g/t silver over 19.0 metres with 0.19% copper, as drilled lengths. In 2026 the Company deepened two 1960s holes, S70-1Ext and S68-5Ext, to the Macumber host formation and logged sulphides in both. Those assays are pending.1

Sources

#CarriesSource
1Walton history (slide 3); the three surveys, the >1 mGal gravity anomaly 800+ m long as mapped and about 1,200 to 1,400 m unfolded, the 163 line-km magnetic survey, three AMT conductors to about 700 m, and the larger, stronger gravity/AMT response than over the Walton orebody (slide 4); 1,120 ha, five holes, about 3,500 m, permit to March 2028 (slide 5); ST-23-001 intervals and the two 2026 deepened holes, assays pending (slide 6); ST-26-01A designed to cut both target zones from the west, the downhole surveys and one 3D model to aim each next hole (slide 7); the team, the in-house model, TruSilver owns the IP, most of the team an hour from the drill (slide 8); C$150,000 in grants (slide 12); the timeline, the 3D model launch, assays interval by interval, lab turnaround four weeks or more, and “data tools, including AI, speed up the work; experienced geologists make every call” (slide 13)TruSilver Metals investor presentation, October 2026. cdn.prod.website-files.com/6a036190534afa3571952184/6ad67e380fe52f75bcb72d4e_TruSilver%20Investor%20Presentation%20October%202026.pdf
2Drilling expected to begin in early November 2026; trading expected on or about October 27, 2026 under TAG, subject to final Exchange acceptanceTruSilver Metals news release, October 15, 2026. trusilvermetals.com/news-releases/nova-scotia-silver-explorer-trusilver-metals-corp-anticipates-tsxv-trading-under-tag-on-october-27
3Jeff Burke’s own quotations and his account of the model, the earlier holes and his work with Jim MichaelisJeff Burke, October 16, 2026
4Significant discoveries at 70 to 90 a year, down from a peak of 202 in 2009 (pp. 20 and 32; p. 28 prints 2008); about US$200 million per significant discovery (p. 32); average depth of cover of 193 m for base-metal discoveries, 2010 to 2019 (p. 32, Table 1); prospectors made about three quarters of discoveries in the early 1900s and under 10% today (p. 32); AI’s benefit “most likely to be felt in brownfield and near-mine exploration” (pp. 23 and 32)R. Schodde, Mineral Deposit Exploration: Discovery Trends 1900 to 2023, SEG Discovery no. 142, July 2025. minexconsulting.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/R-Schodde-Explorn-Paper-for-SEG-July-2025.pdf
5Grassroots exploration at 21% of global budgets in 2025, an all-time low (p. 8)S&P Global, World Exploration Trends 2026. spglobal.com/content/dam/spglobal/mi/en/documents/general/World-exploration-trends-2026.pdf
6Financing of about C$2,830,090 ahead of drilling; five holes and 3,500 metres; the drilling permit; Rio Tinto’s stakingTruSilver Metals / Galaxy Ventures news release, October 9, 2026. trusilvermetals.com/news-releases/galaxy-ventures-inc-receives-conditional-approval-for-qualifying-transaction-with-trusilver-metals-corp-trusilver-completes-2-8-million-financing-ahead-of-drilling-at-sturgis-walton-silver-project
7KoBold Metals began Mingomba as an exploration project in late 2022, broke ground on shaft construction on April 29, 2026, expects first output in the early 2030s, and says similar projects typically take more than 15 years to reach productionKoBold Metals, company post, May 21, 2026. koboldmetals.com/2026/05/21/breaking-ground-at-mingomba-a-new-chapter-for-the-copperbelt/
8Silver added to Nova Scotia’s critical minerals list, May 14, 2025Province of Nova Scotia news release, May 14, 2025. news.novascotia.ca/en/2025/05/14/nova-scotia-updates-critical-minerals-strategy
9Rio Tinto’s staking of the open claims in the Minas sub-basin in late 2025 and its stated focus on copper, quoting CBC News (section 23.3); the drilling permit valid to March 4, 2028 (section 4.6)NI 43-101 Technical Report, Sturgis-Walton Silver Project, effective April 30, 2026; the report effective October 7, 2026 that supersedes it is filed on SEDAR+ under Galaxy Ventures Inc.. sedarplus.ca/
10Industrial demand of 657.4 million ounces in 2025, which “continued to benefit from structural growth in artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure”; total demand 1.13 billion ounces against mine production of 846.6 million ounces, the fifth straight deficitThe Silver Institute, World Silver Survey 2026, April 15, 2026. silverinstitute.org/elevated-lease-rates-regional-liquidity-tightness-and-robust-investor-interest-resulted-in-record-silver-prices-in-2025/

Technical disclosure, supplied by the Company

Technical Disclosure and Qualified Person

Qualified Person: Jeff Burke, P.Geo., a Qualified Person as defined by National Instrument 43-101, has reviewed and approved the scientific and technical information in this web page. Mr. Burke is an employee of the Company and is not independent to the Company.

Drill results

ST-23-001: drilled lengths, true widths unknown; no formal QA/QC in 2023; check sample taken by the Technical Report author (Technical Report, Sections 7 and 12). 2026 holes: visual estimates only (~1% sulphides), not a substitute for assays. Walton Mine figures are historical, not verified by the Qualified Person, and not necessarily indicative of mineralization on the property.

Forward-Looking Information

This webpage contains forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities laws. Forward-looking information includes statements concerning TruSilver’s exploration plans, proposed drilling and geophysical programs, geological interpretations, exploration targets, the possible continuation or geometry of mineralized structures, the branch-and-trunk exploration model, the potential relationship between the Sturgis-Walton Silver Project and the historic Walton Mine, and the possibility of discovering mineralization.

Forward-looking information is based on management’s current expectations, estimates, assumptions and interpretations, including assumptions concerning the availability of financing and personnel, receipt and continued effectiveness of permits, access to the Project, contractor and equipment availability, geological continuity, interpretation of historical and current exploration information, and the timely completion of planned exploration activities.

Forward-looking information involves known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied. These factors include exploration and drilling risks, geological uncertainty, the speculative nature of mineral exploration, the possibility that geological interpretations or exploration models may prove incorrect, the possibility that drilling will not intersect significant mineralization, permitting and environmental risks, availability of financing, commodity-price fluctuations, operating and contractor risks, and other risks associated with mineral exploration. There is no assurance that planned exploration will be completed as proposed or that it will result in the discovery or definition of a mineral resource.

The comparisons to the historic Walton Mine, Irish-Type deposits and other mineral districts are provided solely for geological context. They are not forecasts, projections or indications that mineralization of similar grade, size, continuity or economic significance exists or will be discovered on the Sturgis-Walton Silver Project. No mineral resource or mineral reserve has been defined on the Project, and there is no assurance that further exploration will result in one being defined.

Readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking information. Forward-looking information is provided as of the date of this webpage, and TruSilver disclaims any intention or obligation to update it except as required by applicable securities laws.

Exchange

Neither the TSX-V nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX-V) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

United States

Not for distribution to United States newswire services or dissemination in the United States. The securities described have not been registered under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933 and may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an applicable exemption.

AI-Assisted Drill Targeting at Sturgis-Walton | TruSilver Metals